regulations

EU Detergents Regulation 2026/405: A New Sector Gets Mandatory DPP

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 makes a Digital Product Passport mandatory for detergents and end-user surfactants from 23 September 2029, and bans tracking its use.

3/25/2026 · 10 min read · InfoDPP

Editorial update, 18 July 2026: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778 expressly brings detergents and end-user surfactants covered by Article 21 of Regulation 2026/405 into the horizontal DPP Registry framework. It adds verified registration, interface/API access, technical checks, versioning and registry metadata. It does not change the detergents DPP application date of 23 September 2029, expand the Article 21 product scope or move the full detergent passport into a central EU database.

What Is Regulation (EU) 2026/405?

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 was adopted on 11 February 2026 and published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 2 March 2026. It replaces the old Detergents Regulation (EC) No 648/2004, entered into force on 22 March 2026, and introduces, among other things, a mandatory Digital Product Passport for detergents and end-user surfactants.

Industrial and institutional detergents remain inside the Regulation, but a surfactant supplied only as an upstream B2B input does not automatically follow the same Article 21 DPP layer unless it is made available directly to consumers or other end-users.

Full obligations under the new regulation apply from 23 September 2029.

Why This Is Significant

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 is one of the first confirmed sectors outside ESPR to establish a standalone, mandatory DPP obligation. While ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) provides the general framework for Digital Product Passports across many product categories, the detergents regulation creates its own legal basis, independent of the ESPR delegated-act process.

This is significant for three reasons:

It proves that DPP is no longer limited to ESPR sectors. Other product-specific regulations can and will introduce their own passport requirements.
The scope is broader than household cleaners alone: industrial and institutional detergents remain in scope, while the surfactant layer is narrower and focuses on end-user surfactants.
The timeline is concrete. Unlike many ESPR sectors where delegated acts are still being prepared, the detergents DPP obligation is already law with a defined application date.

Scope and Legal Structure

What replaces what

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 repeals and replaces the old Detergents Regulation (EC) No 648/2004, which governed the sector for over two decades. The old regulation focused primarily on biodegradability testing and basic labelling. The new regulation significantly expands the scope to include digital product information, circular-economy obligations and harmonised safety data.

Product scope

The regulation covers a wide range of detergents, plus surfactants made available directly to end-users. This includes:

Laundry detergents (powder, liquid, capsules, detergent sheets)
Dishwashing products (for hand washing and dishwashers)
All-purpose cleaners and surface cleaning agents
Fabric softeners and conditioning products
Surfactant-containing maintenance products
Surfactants marketed as such to consumers or other end-users

B2B nuance matters: industrial and institutional detergents remain in scope. The narrower carve-out concerns surfactants. If a surfactant is sold only upstream to another manufacturer, it does not automatically carry the same Article 21 DPP layer.

Key articles

Article 17, Article 18 and Annex V create a dual-layer label architecture. Core safety, UFI and use information stay physically available, while selected content may move to a digital layer.
Article 19 governs the digital label and explicitly prohibits tracking, analysing or using how it is accessed beyond what is strictly necessary to display it.
Article 21 and Annex VI require a model-specific DPP linked through a data carrier and define the minimum passport dataset.
Article 21(10)(d) leaves the final actor-by-actor access matrix to a Commission implementing act, so companies should plan for tiered access rather than one flat public record.
Article 22 sets the technical design and operation of the passport, including the same anti-tracking rule and a bar on storing a consumer’s personal data in the passport without explicit consent.
Article 24 and Annex IV require technical documentation, internal production control under Module A and supporting evidence for conformity.

Interaction with CLP, appointed bodies and poison centres

The detergents DPP needs to stay aligned with the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation, UFI logic, the ingredients data sheet and the poison-centre notification system under Annex VIII of CLP. Article 8(6) and Annex IV still keep a separate emergency-health-response layer for appointed bodies where relevant, while the public DPP and label layer serves the end-user.

In practice, one detergent record usually has to feed at least three layers: public label and DPP information, operational refill / e-commerce / packaging data, and authority or poison-centre documentation. The point of the new passport is to synchronise those layers around one product record, not to collapse everything into a single public dataset.

What Data the DPP Must Contain

The Digital Product Passport for detergents and surfactants must be accessible via a QR code or similar data carrier on the product label. But the operational task is broader than publishing one web page: Annex VI fixes the minimum public passport layer, Annex V keeps some fields physically available on the label, and Annex IV preserves technical and emergency-health-response documentation behind that front layer.

Public DPP and label layer

This is the end-user-facing layer: model-linked passport access, data carrier, UFI, the required ingredient disclosure, selected preservatives or fragrance allergens, and any digital-label content that the Regulation allows to move online. It also has to stay aligned with distance-sales disclosure and refill presentation.

Ingredients data sheet and poison-centre layer

Separate from the public passport, manufacturers may still need an ingredients data sheet for appointed bodies and a CLP/UFI-linked poison-centre route. That layer carries the more detailed composition and emergency-health-response information and is not the same thing as publishing the full formulation to consumers.

Technical and conformity layer

Article 24 and Annex IV still require a technical file, internal production control, test reports, calculations, label specimens and, where relevant, biodegradability or microbial-safety evidence. The DPP may state that conformity has been demonstrated, but it does not replace the technical file behind that statement.

Refill, back-up and continuity layer

The operating model also has to cover refill stations, distance-sales disclosures, the back-up DPP provider and continuity of access if the original host fails. In other words, the detergents passport is not just a QR destination page; it is a joined-up compliance and access architecture.

Privacy by Law: The Detergents DPP Is Not a Tracking Channel

One feature sets Regulation (EU) 2026/405 apart from the wider ESPR framework, and most coverage misses it: the detergents passport is legally barred from being turned into a marketing or analytics tracker. The rule appears twice, on purpose: once for the digital label and once for the passport.

For the digital label, Article 19(2) says that economic operators “shall not track, analyse or use any usage information other than as absolutely necessary for the purposes of providing online the information on the digital label.”
For the passport, Article 22(h) says economic operators “do not track, analyse or use any usage information other than as absolutely necessary for the purposes of providing the information on the digital product passport online; in particular, personal data related to the consumer or other end-user … is not stored in the digital product passport without its explicit consent” given in compliance with Article 6 of the GDPR.

Three practical consequences:

It is a purpose-based ban, not just data minimisation. Even fully aggregated, anonymised scan statistics are off-limits if the purpose is anything other than delivering the passport page. The “scan analytics for market intelligence” pitch that some platforms make for other sectors simply does not apply to detergents.
No personal data in the passport without consent. The passport cannot quietly become a customer database; any consumer data needs an explicit GDPR legal basis.
It is stricter than ESPR. The horizontal ESPR framework relies on a general “high level of security and privacy” principle and tiered access rights. The detergents act goes further and adds an explicit, hard prohibition on usage tracking, a “digital-label” pattern that is likely to reappear in future product-specific regulations.

For manufacturers this is reassuring rather than restrictive: the passport you are obliged to publish cannot be weaponised by a platform to profile your customers. When choosing a DPP provider, the right question is whether analytics can be switched off per sector (on for a textile passport, off for a detergent one), not whether the platform tracks everything by default.

Regulatory Timeline

When	What
2 Mar 2026	Regulation (EU) 2026/405 published in the Official Journal
22 Mar 2026	Regulation enters into force
By 1 Oct 2028	Commission must define the detailed digital-labelling rules
23 Sep 2029	Core application date for the DPP, label and refill regime
23 Sep 2030	End of the additional one-year transitional market-availability window

Separate biodegradability milestones then follow on 23 March 2032 and 23 March 2034 for specified materials and substances.

Who Is Affected?

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 covers the following market participants:

Manufacturers of consumer household detergents
Manufacturers of industrial and institutional detergents
Manufacturers of end-user surfactants sold directly to consumers or other end-users
Importers of detergents and surfactants from non-EU countries
Private-label brands and contract manufacturers formulating products for the EU market
Packaging, refill-station and e-commerce operators that need to keep label, DPP and point-of-sale data aligned

What Should You Do Now?

Companies in the detergents and surfactants sector have roughly three years before the full DPP obligation applies. The practical checklist is therefore less about a standalone QR project and more about aligning several compliance layers at once:

Split the product record into layers. Define which fields belong to the public label / DPP, which belong to emergency-health-response workflows, and which belong to the technical file.
Synchronise UFI, the ingredients data sheet and poison-centre routes. Updates to formulation, UFI or hazard data should not drift across the public passport, appointed-body submissions and toxicological-response systems.
Structure model-level ingredient and refill data. Intentional-ingredient, preservative, allergen, refill and distance-sales data should be ready for consistent reuse in the model record.
Collect Annex IV evidence early. Biodegradability, microbial-safety and other conformity evidence should be exportable in a form that supports both checks by authorities and passport updates.
Plan the data carrier, back-up and sales-channel rollout together. Packaging, e-commerce, refill operations and DPP hosting continuity need one implementation track, not four disconnected projects.

For a step-by-step approach to DPP preparation across sectors, see: DPP Step-by-Step Guide

What This Does Not Change

To be clear about the boundaries:

Regulation (EU) 2026/405 does not modify ESPR or its delegated-act process
It does not remove industrial and institutional detergents from scope
It does not make the full formulation, the ingredients data sheet or the technical file public
It does not replace the UFI, appointed-body or poison-centre response channels with a simple QR page
It does not automatically apply the same Article 21 DPP layer to a surfactant sold only upstream as a B2B input
It does not create a centralised warehouse for the full detergent passport. Regulation 2026/1778 now creates the EU registration and indexing layer, while the detailed DPP remains hosted by the economic operator or its provider
It does not allow the passport or digital label to be used to track, analyse or profile how consumers access it (Article 19(2) and Article 22(h))

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

When does the detergents Digital Product Passport become mandatory?

The core application date is 23 September 2029. Products lawfully placed on the market before that date can continue to be made available, and a one-year transitional window runs to 23 September 2030 for products placed under the old regime during the transition.

Does the detergents DPP let me track who scans my product?

No. Article 19(2) (digital label) and Article 22(h) (passport) prohibit economic operators from tracking, analysing or using usage information beyond what is strictly necessary to display the information online, and bar storing a consumer’s personal data in the passport without explicit GDPR consent. Unlike a marketing QR code, the detergents passport cannot be used as an analytics or profiling channel.

Is this stricter than the general ESPR rules?

Yes. ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) relies on tiered access rights and a general security-and-privacy principle, but has no explicit ban on analysing passport usage. The detergents regulation adds that explicit prohibition, so a compliant platform must be able to disable scan analytics for detergent passports.

Do industrial and professional detergents need a passport too?

Yes. Industrial and institutional detergents stay in scope, even where some ingredient disclosure can move to the safety-data-sheet route. The narrower carve-out concerns surfactants: a surfactant supplied only as an upstream B2B input does not automatically carry the same Article 21 passport layer unless it is made available directly to consumers or other end-users.

Does the passport replace the physical label, the UFI or the poison-centre notification?

No. Core safety, UFI and use information stay physically available on the label (Article 17, Article 18, Annex V), and the CLP/UFI poison-centre route and appointed-body ingredients data sheet remain separate channels. The passport synchronises these layers around one product record; it does not collapse them into a single public page.

Official Sources

Need to structure ingredient, safety and sustainability data in one product passport? Start free on OriginPass.eu and test a structured DPP data workflow.

← Back to Blog