ESPR Non-Compliance Penalties: Fines, Withdrawal, Import Bans

Why ESPR Penalties Should Be on Every Manufacturer’s Radar

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, is not a soft guideline — it is a binding EU regulation that establishes a framework for market surveillance and penalties in cases of non-compliance. That said, it is important to distinguish between what is already fixed in law and how individual Member States will actually prioritise inspections, organise procedures, and apply penalties in practice. For battery categories covered by battery passport rules, the first binding date starts on 18 February 2027.

Yet many manufacturers, importers, and distributors still treat DPP compliance as a future concern. This article breaks down exactly what happens when businesses fail to meet their ESPR obligations — and how to avoid costly penalties.

Legal Basis: Where ESPR Defines Penalties

The ESPR lays out its enforcement framework across several chapters (such as Chapter XI for Market surveillance and Chapter XIV for Final provisions):

Article	Subject	Key Provision
Art. 74	Penalties	Member States must lay down rules on penalties, including fines and temporary exclusion from public procurement; they must be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive
Art. 69	Safeguard procedure	Allows Member States to act against non-compliant products, including withdrawal and recall
Chapter XI	Market surveillance	Links to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance and product compliance

Critical detail: National implementation

Unlike a directive, ESPR is a regulation — it applies directly in all EU Member States. However, Article 74 specifically delegates penalty rules to national governments. This means:

• Each Member State defines its own fine amounts, temporary procurement exclusions and enforcement procedures
• Penalties must be “effective, proportionate, and dissuasive” (the EU minimum standard)
• Member States must notify the European Commission of their penalty regimes
• Notification to the Commission does not create a single EU-wide fine schedule

This creates a patchwork where fines for the same violation can differ significantly between Germany, France, Spain, and other markets.

What Counts as Non-Compliance?

Non-compliance with ESPR covers a broad range of violations. Understanding these is essential because you don’t need to ignore the regulation entirely to face penalties — even partial non-compliance can trigger enforcement action.

1. Missing Digital Product Passport

The most obvious violation: placing a product on the EU market without the required DPP after the applicable deadline. This applies to:

• Products without the DPP data carrier required for the relevant product category
• Products with a data carrier that leads to an empty or non-functional DPP
• Products where the DPP data carrier is not accessible to end users

2. Incomplete or inaccurate DPP data

Even if a DPP exists, it can be non-compliant if:

• Required data fields are missing (as defined in the product-specific delegated act)
• Data is materially inaccurate — e.g., wrong carbon footprint values, incorrect material composition
• Data is outdated — the DPP must reflect the actual state of the product
• Data format doesn’t meet technical standards — the DPP must be machine-readable

3. Non-compliant data carrier

The physical data carrier on the product label must meet specific requirements. Under the ESPR this does not automatically mean a QR code in every case: the regulation defines a data carrier more broadly as a linear barcode symbol, a two-dimensional symbol, or another automatic identification data capture medium readable by a device. The specific format is to be set by the applicable delegated act or sector-specific regulation.

• Must use an open, interoperable data carrier carrying a unique product identifier, per ESPR Art. 9-10 and Annex III; the specific format will follow from harmonised standards and each sector’s delegated or standalone act. GS1 Digital Link is a common practical implementation but is not named as the only mandatory URL format in the ESPR itself.
• Must be scannable and durable throughout the product’s lifecycle
• Must lead to an accessible and functional DPP endpoint
• Must be placed in a visible location on the product, its packaging, or on documentation accompanying the product (per Art. 10 ESPR) as specified in the applicable delegated act

The clearest exception today is batteries: Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 expressly requires a QR code. From 18 February 2027, all batteries must be marked with a QR code and, for LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh and electric vehicle batteries, that QR code must provide access to the battery passport.

4. Failure to update DPP information

DPP data is not static. Manufacturers must update their DPPs when:

• Product composition changes
• Sustainability certifications are renewed or revoked
• Repair information or spare parts availability changes
• Any information that affects compliance becomes outdated

5. Obstruction of market surveillance

Refusing or failing to cooperate with market surveillance authorities — such as not providing requested documentation or access to DPP data — is a separate offence with its own penalties.

Types of Penalties and Sanctions

ESPR enforcement goes far beyond monetary fines. The regulation and the linked Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 establish a multi-layered penalty system:

Financial penalties

The most direct consequence. The ESPR does not set a single EU-wide fine schedule. It requires Member States to establish penalties that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The safest current approach is therefore to look at the first national regimes implementing sector-specific obligations, especially batteries, rather than presenting a hypothetical EU table.

Current evidence status

DPP penalty tracker by scope

As of 19 May 2026, the clearest country-level penalty examples relate to the battery passport. Other DPP scopes are shown as regulatory context until national rules are specific enough to compare.

Active table

Scope

Batteries Confirmed country examples General ESPR Framework duty, no fine table yet Other DPP sectors Sector rules emerging

Battery passport is the only scope with concrete national examples in this tracker today.

The first operational DPP deadline is 18 February 2027 for the battery categories covered by Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. The examples below track national enforcement and penalty frameworks tied to that regime.

Germany

Adopted provisions

BattDG §60(2)(29)

Legal basis

BattDG §60(2)(29) linked to Battery Regulation Article 77(4)

Consequence

Failure to keep Article 77(4) battery-passport information correct, complete and up to date can trigger fines up to EUR 10,000. Higher caps apply elsewhere in §60 for selected market, marking and due-diligence breaches.

France

Adopted provisions

Article L521-18

Legal basis

Code de l'environnement and Code de la consommation

Consequence

After a formal notice, authorities can impose an administrative fine up to EUR 15,000 plus EUR 1,500 per day, ban import/manufacture/placing on the market, order withdrawal, or require return or disposal of non-compliant imported or manufactured goods at the operator’s cost.

Italy

Adopted provisions

Article 34

Legal basis

Decreto legislativo 10 febbraio 2026, n. 29

Consequence

Article 34 sets EUR 10,000-150,000 for placing batteries on the market with missing or non-conforming collection symbols and, from 18 February 2027, Article 13(6)-(7) marking/QR breaches. The same range can apply where formal non-conformities or due-diligence breaches are not remedied in time.

Sweden

Complementary framework adopted

Regeringen.se

Legal basis

Government proposal for complementary battery provisions

Consequence

The Swedish legislative process has reached a parliamentary decision. The public summary focuses on enforcement powers: document and data requests, unannounced inspections, access to premises or transport, own-initiative investigations, corrective measures, sampling, dismantling and online-interface restrictions.

Netherlands

Implementation in progress

Kamerstuk 36880-3

Legal basis

Battery Regulation implementation bill

Consequence

The bill broadens the Environmental Management Act basis so battery rules can also cover product safety and health, with ILT/NVWA enforcement logic. It establishes the need for sanctions, but does not yet specify a DPP infringement amount.

Poland

Draft legislation in progress

UC107

Legal basis

Draft act on batteries and waste batteries

Consequence

UC107 would set the supervisory authority, conformity-assessment framework and sanctions for breaches of the Battery Regulation. Because it is still a draft, it is a legislative signal, not an adopted Polish fine for a missing or defective DPP.

Country examples for battery passport enforcement

Country	Status	Legal basis	Consequence	Official source
Germany	Adopted provisions	BattDG §60(2)(29) linked to Battery Regulation Article 77(4)	Failure to keep Article 77(4) battery-passport information correct, complete and up to date can trigger fines up to EUR 10,000. Higher caps apply elsewhere in §60 for selected market, marking and due-diligence breaches.	BattDG §60(2)(29)
France	Adopted provisions	Code de l'environnement and Code de la consommation	After a formal notice, authorities can impose an administrative fine up to EUR 15,000 plus EUR 1,500 per day, ban import/manufacture/placing on the market, order withdrawal, or require return or disposal of non-compliant imported or manufactured goods at the operator’s cost.	Article L521-18
Italy	Adopted provisions	Decreto legislativo 10 febbraio 2026, n. 29	Article 34 sets EUR 10,000-150,000 for placing batteries on the market with missing or non-conforming collection symbols and, from 18 February 2027, Article 13(6)-(7) marking/QR breaches. The same range can apply where formal non-conformities or due-diligence breaches are not remedied in time.	Article 34
Sweden	Complementary framework adopted	Government proposal for complementary battery provisions	The Swedish legislative process has reached a parliamentary decision. The public summary focuses on enforcement powers: document and data requests, unannounced inspections, access to premises or transport, own-initiative investigations, corrective measures, sampling, dismantling and online-interface restrictions.	Regeringen.se
Netherlands	Implementation in progress	Battery Regulation implementation bill	The bill broadens the Environmental Management Act basis so battery rules can also cover product safety and health, with ILT/NVWA enforcement logic. It establishes the need for sanctions, but does not yet specify a DPP infringement amount.	Kamerstuk 36880-3
Poland	Draft legislation in progress	Draft act on batteries and waste batteries	UC107 would set the supervisory authority, conformity-assessment framework and sanctions for breaches of the Battery Regulation. Because it is still a draft, it is a legislative signal, not an adopted Polish fine for a missing or defective DPP.	UC107

General ESPR penalties are a Member State legal duty.

ESPR Article 74 requires Member States to set effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties. Specific amounts depend on national implementation and the applicable product sector.

Other DPP sectors are tracked as regulatory context for now.

Detergents, toys and future ESPR delegated acts may create sector-specific enforcement patterns. This view avoids listing amounts where official national penalty rules are not specific enough.

Product withdrawal from the market

Market surveillance authorities can order the immediate withdrawal of non-compliant products. This means:

• Products must be removed from all sales channels (physical and online)
• Existing inventory cannot be sold until compliance is achieved
• For online sales, authorities can order platforms to de-list the product
• For unsafe products, the case can also be notified in the EU Safety Gate (formerly RAPEX), which is the EU alert system for dangerous products rather than a general DPP non-compliance register

Import bans

Customs authorities at EU borders have the power to act on products that are subject to an applicable DPP mandate (ESPR delegated act or standalone regulation such as batteries, detergents, toys) and fail to present the required passport or technical documentation. In scope, they may:

• Stop and hold shipments of in-scope products that do not have the required DPP or supporting evidence
• Refuse entry to products that do not meet the applicable ESPR or sectoral requirements
• Destroy or return non-compliant goods at the importer’s expense
• Apply additional customs penalties for repeated violations

Operational integration between the DPP registry and customs is still being built up, so concrete enforcement depth will depend on sector and Member State.

This is particularly relevant for importers sourcing from non-EU manufacturers who may not yet be familiar with DPP requirements.

Public naming and market reputation damage

The ESPR and Market Surveillance Regulation provide for public disclosure of non-compliance:

• Unsafe products may be notified in EU Safety Gate; other compliance findings may be disclosed through national decisions, notices or reports
• Market surveillance authorities publish annual reports identifying non-compliant sectors
• Major non-compliance cases may receive media coverage, damaging brand reputation
• B2B customers increasingly check compliance status before signing supply contracts

Supply chain liability

ESPR creates a chain of responsibility across the supply chain:

• Manufacturers bear primary liability for creating and maintaining the DPP
• Importers are liable if they place non-compliant products on the EU market
• Distributors face penalties if they sell products they know (or should know) lack proper DPP
• Online marketplaces, under the Digital Services Act (Reg. (EU) 2022/2065), the General Product Safety Regulation (Reg. (EU) 2023/988) and the Market Surveillance Regulation (Reg. (EU) 2019/1020), must cooperate with authorities and can be required to de-list products flagged as non-compliant with DPP obligations where applicable
• Authorised representatives can be held liable for products they represent

Who Enforces DPP Requirements?

Market Surveillance Authorities (MSAs)

Each EU Member State designates one or more Market Surveillance Authorities responsible for enforcing product requirements. In practice, competence is sector-specific: product safety, chemicals, batteries, electronics, packaging and online sales can involve different authorities. The examples below are entry points and sector bodies, not a complete map of every competent authority in the EU:

Country	Authority	Focus
🇩🇪 Germany	BAuA (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin) + Länder authorities	Federal coordination + regional enforcement
🇫🇷 France	DGCCRF (Direction Générale de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la Répression des Fraudes)	Consumer protection and product compliance
🇪🇸 Spain	Ministerio de Consumo + Regional authorities	Coordinated national approach
🇵🇱 Poland	UOKiK (Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów) + Trade Inspection	Market surveillance and competition
🇮🇹 Italy	MIMIT + sector authorities	Product safety, CE marking and sector enforcement
🇳🇱 Netherlands	NVWA + ILT + sector authorities	Consumer products, environmental requirements and sector checks
🇸🇪 Sweden	Swedac / Market Surveillance Council + sector authorities	National coordination and enforcement by specialised agencies
🇫🇮 Finland	Tukes (Turvallisuus- ja kemikaalivirasto)	Safety and chemicals agency

Authorities also use EU cooperation tools such as ICSMS, which allows market surveillance bodies in EU and EFTA countries to exchange information about non-compliant products.

Customs authorities

At the EU’s external borders, customs authorities serve as the first line of enforcement for imported goods, verifying DPP documentation before products enter the Single Market.

European Commission oversight

The European Commission monitors enforcement across Member States and can:

• Initiate infringement proceedings against states that don’t enforce properly
• Mandate standardisation requests to CEN/CENELEC/ETSI and cite harmonised standards in the Official Journal (the hEN technical text itself is drafted and published by the European Standardisation Organisations, not by the Commission)
• Coordinate EU-wide enforcement campaigns targeting specific product categories
• Maintain the EU Digital Product Passport Registry (Art. 13 ESPR, infrastructure in preparation)

How Enforcement Works in Practice

At this stage, some caution is necessary: the overall enforcement direction is already visible in the legal framework, but the exact inspection sequence will still depend on product category, national procedure, implementing measures, and market-surveillance practice. The outline below shows a likely enforcement path, not a single fully standardised process that is already operating identically across the EU.

Step 1: Market surveillance inspection

MSAs may carry out proactive inspections and may also react to complaints, customs checks, or sector-specific control campaigns. In practice, inspections can include both physical checks (in stores or warehouses) and digital reviews (such as online listings). Where a DPP and data carrier are already required for a category, authorities will typically verify:

• Does the product have a data carrier?
• Does the QR code resolve to a valid DPP?
• Is the DPP data complete and accurate?
• Does the data match the physical product?

Step 2: Notification of non-compliance

If a violation is found, the MSA may issue a formal notification or corrective-action request to the economic operator. The exact form depends on national procedure, but it often includes:

• Description of the violation
• Deadline for corrective action (often somewhere between several days and several weeks, depending on the national procedure)
• Warning that the case may escalate if the issue is not resolved

Step 3: Corrective measures

The manufacturer or importer will typically need to:

• Fix the DPP (add missing data, correct inaccuracies)
• Provide evidence of compliance to the MSA
• Recall or update affected products if already sold
• Document corrective actions for future audits

Step 4: Penalties for unresolved non-compliance

If corrective measures are not taken within the deadline, or if the authority considers the breach serious, the case may escalate to:

• Formal fine issuance
• Market withdrawal orders
• Publication of the non-compliance in official registers
• In severe cases, criminal prosecution (in Member States that classify certain violations as criminal offences)

The Battery Regulation: A Preview of ESPR Enforcement

The Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is currently the closest practical reference point for how DPP enforcement may develop within the broader ESPR ecosystem, since the battery passport becomes mandatory from 18 February 2027 for categories covered by that regulation. That does not mean the enforcement mechanics will later be identical across every ESPR sector.

Key enforcement provisions specific to batteries:

• Battery categories covered by the battery passport rules will need to have a passport in line with Regulation (EU) 2023/1542
• From 18 February 2027, all batteries must be marked with a QR code; for LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh and electric vehicle batteries, the QR code must lead to the battery passport
• DPP must include state of health data, carbon footprint declaration, and recycled content
• The economic operator placing the battery on the market must ensure that the battery passport information is accurate, complete and up to date
• Member States are required to define penalties for non-compliant batteries in national implementing legislation
• Germany, France and Italy already have concrete national provisions showing that sanctions will not be merely theoretical

This is no longer just a theoretical discussion: manufacturers within battery passport scope should assume real supervisory and enforcement activity once the obligation applies, even if the exact intensity and sequencing will vary by national practice.

Cross-Border Enforcement: The EU Safety Net

One of the most powerful aspects of ESPR enforcement is the EU-wide coordination mechanism:

Mutual recognition of non-compliance

If a product is found non-compliant in one Member State, other Member States can be alerted through EU market-surveillance cooperation mechanisms; Safety Gate is used where the case involves a serious product-safety risk. This means:

• A product withdrawn in Germany is flagged across all 27 EU markets
• The manufacturer cannot simply sell non-compliant stock in another country
• Cross-border online sales are monitored through coordinated marketplace surveillance

Joint enforcement actions

The European Commission can coordinate joint actions where MSAs from multiple Member States simultaneously check compliance in a specific product category. These “sweeps” have been effective in other product-safety areas and are a reasonable indicator of how enforcement practice may also develop for DPP.

Financial Impact: Beyond Fines

The true cost of ESPR non-compliance extends far beyond the monetary fines:

Direct costs

• Fines and administrative penalties — ranging from thousands to hundreds of thousands of euros
• Product withdrawal costs — logistics of removing products from shelves and warehouses
• Inventory write-offs — unsellable stock during non-compliance period
• Legal fees — for contesting or managing penalty proceedings

Indirect costs

• Lost revenue — inability to sell products during withdrawal period
• Customer contract penalties — B2B customers may invoke penalty clauses for non-compliant deliveries
• Insurance implications — product liability insurance may not cover regulatory non-compliance
• Tender exclusions — public procurement increasingly requires ESPR compliance proof

Reputational costs

• Brand damage — public listing as a non-compliant company
• Customer trust erosion — especially among sustainability-conscious consumers
• Investor concerns — ESG ratings may be affected
• Supply chain exclusion — large retailers removing non-compliant suppliers

How to Avoid ESPR Penalties: Compliance Checklist

The good news: ESPR compliance is achievable, especially with early preparation. Follow this checklist:

Immediate actions (start now)

1. Identify your product categories — determine which delegated acts apply to your products
2. Check your deadlines — batteries have a fixed February 2027 passport date; future ESPR categories depend on delegated acts and the Commission work plan
3. Set product identifiers — GTINs are often useful, but the mandatory identifier level and format will come from the applicable delegated or sector-specific act
4. Audit your product data — inventory what sustainability, composition, and lifecycle data you already have
5. Choose a DPP platform — select a tool that generates compliant DPPs with proper data carriers

Before your deadline

6. Create DPPs at the required level — ensure the relevant model, batch or item has a complete passport where the applicable act requires it
7. Generate and apply the right data carrier — for batteries this means a QR code; for future ESPR categories, check the format specified in the delegated or sector-specific act
8. Verify data completeness — cross-check your DPP data against the applicable delegated act requirements
9. Test the end-to-end flow — scan your QR codes and verify the DPP is accessible and accurate
10. Train your team — ensure procurement, production, and quality teams understand DPP obligations

Ongoing compliance

11. Update DPPs when products change — new materials, new certifications, new suppliers
12. Monitor regulatory updates — delegated acts may be amended with new requirements
13. Respond to MSA requests promptly — delays in providing information escalate penalties
14. Maintain audit trail — document all DPP creation, updates, and compliance activities

Don’t Wait for Enforcement to Start

You do not need perfect visibility on every future inspection detail to prepare sensibly. The direction is clear: as sector-specific obligations take effect, authorities will expect accessible product data, a functioning data carrier, and the ability to demonstrate compliance. The earlier you structure identifiers, product data, and audit trails, the lower the risk of a last-minute scramble when enforcement becomes more active.

Official Sources

• ESPR Regulation (EU) 2024/1781
• Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020
• Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542
• Germany: BattDG penalty provisions
• France: Code de l’environnement, Article L521-18
• Italy: Decreto legislativo 10 febbraio 2026, n. 29, Article 34
• Sweden: complementary battery framework
• Netherlands: Battery Regulation implementation bill
• Ecodesign / Green Forum implementation updates
• European Commission: ICSMS and market-surveillance cooperation
• Italy: MIMIT, consumer product safety
• Netherlands: NVWA, product safety
• Sweden: Market Surveillance Council and sector authorities

The cost of compliance today is a fraction of the cost of non-compliance tomorrow. With self-service platforms like OriginPass, generating DPPs for your products takes minutes — not months.

---

Not sure where to start? Read our step-by-step guide to creating a DPP — from product identifiers to QR code labels.

Don’t risk fines and market withdrawal. Start generating compliant Digital Product Passports for free on OriginPass.eu — setup takes less than 5 minutes, no credit card required.